IN BRIEF

The difference between trademark, copyright and design is that each right under its own Act protects a different thing: a trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 protects the sign buyers identify you by, copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957 protects the creative work itself, and a registered design under the Designs Act, 2000 protects how a product looks.

You built three things last year. A name your customers now ask for by heart. A logo your designer drew over one long weekend. And a bottle shape your customers can spot from across a supermarket aisle.

Three things. Three different laws. Three different registers, three different clocks, and three very different answers to the question "is this protected?"

I meet founders who use the three words as if they were interchangeable. They are not. A trademark protects the sign that tells a buyer whose product this is. Copyright protects the creative work itself — the words, the art, the code, the tune. A registered design protects how a product looks. Pick the wrong door and you can spend money, wait months, and still hold no right over the thing you actually cared about.

Here is the split, plainly.

The one-line test I use with clients

Ask what a copycat would be copying.

If they copy the name, the logo or the tagline your buyers recognise you by, that is trademark territory. If they copy your written content, your artwork, your photographs, your software code or your music, that is copyright. If they copy the shape, pattern or surface look of the product itself, that is design.

Think of it the way you would think of a house. The name plate on the gate is the trademark — it tells visitors whose house this is. The paintings and the furniture inside are copyright — someone made them, and copying them is theft of the work. The shape of the building, the curve of the staircase, the pattern on the facade — that is design. One house. Three separate things worth protecting, and no single lock covers all three.

Trademark: the sign your buyers trust

Section 2(1)(zb) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 defines a trade mark as a mark that can be represented graphically and can distinguish the goods or services of one person from those of another. A "mark" under section 2(1)(m) is wide: a device, brand, heading, label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral, the shape of goods, packaging, or a combination of colours.

Read that definition slowly. The test is not beauty. The test is distinction. Does this sign point to you, and only you, in the buyer's mind?

That is why a coined word works so well and a descriptive one struggles. It is also why trademark protection is tied to classes of goods and services. Your registration in Class 25 for clothing says nothing about someone using the same name for a restaurant in Class 43. The right lives where your trade lives.

Two features make the trademark the workhorse of the three:

  • It runs from your filing date. Under section 23, when the mark is finally registered, it is registered as of the date you made the application. That date is deemed to be the date of registration. The long examination queue does not eat your priority.
  • It can live forever. Section 25 gives a registration a life of ten years, and you may renew it again and again, ten years at a time. No other right in this article renews without limit. Our guide to trademark renewal in Form TM-R walks through the renewal window and the grace period.

Registration is not compulsory. You can trade on an unregistered mark and still sue a copycat for passing off under section 27. But that is a harder fight — you must prove your reputation from scratch. A registered mark hands you the certificate, the exclusive right under section 28, and an infringement action under section 29 where the registration itself does the heavy lifting. Before you file, run the free check we explain in our walkthrough of the IP India trademark public search. Five minutes there can save you a refused application.

The government fee for filing Form TM-A online is ₹4,500 per class if you are an individual, a recognised startup or a small enterprise, and ₹9,000 per class for other applicants, under the First Schedule to the Trade Marks Rules, 2017.

Copyright: the work itself, protected from the moment you make it

Copyright sits in a different place altogether. Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 says copyright subsists in original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, in cinematograph films, and in sound recordings.

Notice the word "original". Copyright does not protect an idea. It protects the expression of the idea — the actual words you wrote, the actual drawing you made, the actual code you typed. Two people can lawfully write two different books about the same idea. Neither can photocopy the other's book.

And here is the part clients find hardest to believe: you do not have to register it. Copyright subsists the moment an original work is created. Registration under section 45 — filed in Form XIV under Rule 70 of the Copyright Rules, 2013 — is optional. What registration buys you is a public record: under section 48, the Register of Copyrights is prima facie evidence of the particulars entered in it, which makes an ownership dispute far easier to fight. The fee is modest — ₹500 per work for a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work under the Second Schedule, and ₹2,000 for an artistic work used or capable of being used on goods or services. Worth it for a logo, a catalogue or a codebase you would be angry to see copied. Not a condition of the right existing.

The term is the longest of the three. For a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work published in the author's lifetime, section 22 gives the author's life plus sixty years, counted from the start of the calendar year after the author dies. Films, sound recordings and photographs run on a different clock — sixty years from publication — so do not carry the life-plus-sixty rule across every category.

One honest warning. Copyright in your content does not stop a competitor from selling a rival product. It stops them copying your content. If your worry is "someone will steal my product idea", copyright was never the tool for that job.

Design: how the product looks — and only if you register

Now the third door, and the one most often missed until it is too late.

Section 2(d) of the Designs Act, 2000 defines a design as the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament, or composition of lines or colours applied to an article by an industrial process, which in the finished article appeal to and are judged solely by the eye.

Every word there earns its place. "Judged solely by the eye" means the Act protects appearance, not function. How the article works is not design law's concern. A clever mechanism belongs in patent territory. A beautiful shape belongs here.

The definition also shuts two doors in the same breath. A design does not include any trade mark, and it does not include any artistic work as defined in section 2(c) of the Copyright Act. Parliament drew the borders inside the definition itself.

Unlike copyright, a design right exists only if you register. India has no unregistered design right. Section 4 bars registration of a design that is not new or original, that has already been disclosed to the public anywhere before the filing or priority date, that is not significantly distinguishable from known designs, or that carries scandalous or obscene matter. That disclosure bar is brutal in practice: launch the product at a trade fair first, file later, and your own launch can be used against you.

The term is the shortest of the three. Section 11 gives the registered proprietor copyright in the design for ten years from the date of registration. Before those ten years end, you may apply to extend it by one further period of five years. Ten plus five. Fifteen at most, and then the look enters the public world for anyone to use.

Registration is not beyond challenge either. Under section 19, any person interested may petition the Controller to cancel a registration — because the design was registered before, was published earlier, is not new or original, is not registrable, or is not a "design" within section 2(d) at all.

The overlap that catches people: one logo, two rights

Here is where clients get tangled, and fairly so.

Your logo can be two things at once. As the sign your buyers recognise, it is a trademark — file it, use it, renew it every ten years. As an original piece of artwork, it is also an artistic work in which copyright subsists from creation, lasting the artist's life plus sixty years. Both protections can sit on the same drawing because they answer different attacks: the trademark answers "he is passing off his goods as mine", the copyright answers "he lifted my artwork".

The design border is stricter, and section 15 of the Copyright Act polices it:

  • If a design is registered under the Designs Act, copyright does not subsist in that design under the Copyright Act. You take the design route and its fifteen-year ceiling.
  • If a design is capable of registration but never registered, copyright in it ceases as soon as an article bearing it has been reproduced more than fifty times by an industrial process by you or your licensee.

That fifty-times rule has ended real claims. A fabric print or a product shape, made and sold in the thousands without a design filing, can lose its copyright cover precisely because it succeeded commercially. If a look will be mass-produced, the design application belongs in the launch plan, not in next year's budget.

Side by side, so you can decide in one reading

QuestionTrademarkCopyrightDesign
What it protectsThe sign buyers use to identify you: name, logo, tagline, packaging coloursThe creative work: text, art, photos, music, films, recordings, codeThe look of an article: shape, configuration, pattern, ornament, lines and colours
Governing lawTrade Marks Act, 1999Copyright Act, 1957Designs Act, 2000
Must you register?No — but registration under section 28 is far stronger than a passing-off claimNo — the right subsists on creation under section 13; registration is optional evidenceYes — no registration, no design right
How long10 years under section 25, renewable without limitAuthor's life plus 60 years under section 22 for literary and artistic works10 years under section 11, extendable once by 5 years
What it will not doProtect your content, your product's look, or your ideaStop a rival product or a similar brand nameProtect function, a brand name, or an artistic work as such

So, what should you file first?

For most businesses I advise, the order runs like this.

File the trademark first. Your name and logo carry your market, the fee is per class and known upfront, and the filing date protects you while the Registry takes its time. Then register copyright in the few works that truly matter — the logo artwork, the core content, the software — as evidence you may one day need. And if your product's look is part of why people buy it, file the design before the product is shown to the world, not after the first copy appears in the market.

Three rights. Three jobs. The mistake is never that founders protect too little on purpose — it is that they file the one right they have heard of and assume it covers the other two. It does not.

If you want the trademark side sorted properly — the search, the right classes, and Form TM-A filed clean — start with our trademark registration service and we will map which of the three doors your business actually needs.