IN BRIEF

The angel tax abolition is the sunset of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, under which the clause does not apply from assessment year 2025-26, so a closely-held company is no longer taxed on share premium received above fair market value.

Short answer first: for shares your company issues now, the angel tax is gone. Not reduced, not narrowed — gone, for every investor, resident or foreign, recognised startup or not. If you are pricing a round today, section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is no longer a line in the negotiation.

But "the tax is abolished" is where most summaries stop, and it is exactly where founders get into trouble. The abolition removed one provision. It did not remove the Assessing Officer's power to question your share capital, it did not touch FEMA pricing on foreign money, and it did not change what happens when shares change hands below value. This post maps what ended, what continues, and what your next fundraise should do differently — and what it should not.

What the angel tax was

Section 56(2)(viib) was inserted by the Finance Act, 2012. Where a company in which the public are not substantially interested — in plain words, a closely-held company, which covers nearly every startup — received consideration for issuing shares above the fair market value of those shares, the excess was taxed in the company's hands as income from other sources.

Read that slowly. The company was taxed. Not the investor. A young company that persuaded an angel to back its future at a premium over a formula-driven present value received a tax bill on the premium — money it had raised to build the business. Valuations of unlisted shares were worked out under Rule 11UA of the Income-tax Rules, and the gap between a founder's negotiated price and the rule-book value became a dispute factory for over a decade.

For most of that life, the clause bit only on money from residents. The Finance Act, 2023 widened it to non-resident investors for shares issued from financial year 2023-24, and in September 2023 the CBDT amended Rule 11UA — Notification No. 81/2023 — adding five valuation methods for non-resident investment alongside the net asset value and discounted cash flow methods that already existed. The net had just been cast wider, and valuation had just become more elaborate, when the policy reversed.

The sunset: what the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 actually did

In the Union Budget presented on 23 July 2024, the Finance Minister proposed abolishing the angel tax "for all classes of investors". The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 carried that proposal into law by sunsetting the clause: the memorandum explaining the Finance Bill records the decision in terms — the provisions of clause (viib) "shall not apply from the assessment year 2025-26", with the amendment taking effect from 1 April 2025 and applying accordingly from assessment year 2025-26.

Translate the assessment-year language, because it decides real cases. Assessment year 2025-26 is the year in which income of financial year 2024-25 is assessed. So shares issued in financial year 2024-25 and in every later year carry no angel tax at all — whatever the premium, whoever the investor. If your round closed in, say, October 2024, it is already outside the clause.

Two boundaries, stated plainly:

  • It is not retrospective absolution. Shares issued in earlier years were issued under the law as it then stood. Assessments, notices and appeals for those years continue under the old provision; the sunset does not annul a demand already raised for a pre-2024-25 issue.
  • It is not startup-specific any more. The abolition covers all closely-held companies and all investors. DPIIT recognition is irrelevant to this particular question now.

The DPIIT exemption route is history — file it under "was"

Between 2019 and the sunset, recognised startups had an escape hatch. Under the DPIIT notification G.S.R. 127(E) of 19 February 2019, a DPIIT-recognised startup was exempt from section 56(2)(viib) if its aggregate paid-up share capital and share premium after the issue did not exceed ₹25 crore — amounts from non-residents, venture capital companies and funds, and certain large listed companies were left out of that ceiling — and if it stayed away from a list of specified assets for seven years. The startup filed a declaration in Form 2 with DPIIT, which forwarded it to the CBDT.

That machinery is now a museum piece. You do not file Form 2 to escape a tax that no longer applies. If an old guide — or an old checklist from your own files — still lists "angel tax exemption" as a live benefit of recognition, cross it out. Recognition remains valuable for other reasons; the section 80-IAC tax holiday, for one, is very much alive and still needs its own Inter-Ministerial Board certificate. But this particular shield has been retired because the attack it blocked no longer exists.

What abolition did not change: the boundary map

Here is the part of this post I most need you to keep.

ProvisionStill applies?What it means on your next round
Section 56(2)(viib) — tax on share premium above fair market valueNo — not applicable from assessment year 2025-26No angel tax on shares issued in financial year 2024-25 or later, for any investor
Section 68 — unexplained cash creditsYes, untouchedThe Assessing Officer can still test the identity and creditworthiness of your investors and the genuineness of the transaction behind share capital and premium in your books
FEMA pricing — Rule 21, Non-Debt Instruments Rules, 2019Yes, untouchedShares issued to a person resident outside India must not be priced below fair market value, worked out on an internationally accepted methodology and certified as the Rules require
Section 50CA and section 56(2)(x) — transfers below valueYes, untouchedWhen existing shares are transferred below fair market value, the seller can be taxed as if fair market value was received, and the buyer can be taxed on the discount

Take section 68 first, because it is the one that will actually meet you. Where share application money, share capital or share premium is credited in a closely-held company's books, the explanation the company offers is treated as unsatisfactory unless the resident investor in whose name the credit stands also explains the nature and source of the sum, to the Assessing Officer's satisfaction. That is a genuineness test, not a valuation test — and abolition did not go near it. An investor whose money trail is thin, whose own tax filings do not support the investment, or who cannot be identified properly is still a problem for you, premium or no premium.

FEMA is the second live wire. If any part of your round is foreign money, the pricing guideline in Rule 21 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 still requires that equity instruments of an unlisted Indian company issued to a person resident outside India be priced not below fair market value, certified by a chartered accountant, a SEBI-registered merchant banker or a practising cost accountant, as applicable. So a valuation report has not left your closing checklist. It has changed employers — it now works for FEMA and for your investors' diligence, instead of for the angel tax.

The third row matters when shares move between people rather than out of the company: an exit, a founder transfer, a secondary sale. Section 50CA can deem fair market value to be the seller's full consideration where unquoted shares are transferred for less, and section 56(2)(x) can tax the recipient on the shortfall where it exceeds ₹50,000. A casually priced internal transfer is still an expensive mistake.

Put together, the picture is this: the toll gate on the highway has been dismantled, but the traffic police are still on duty. You drive faster now. You do not drive without papers.

So what actually changes in your next fundraise?

  • One negotiation friction is gone. You and your investors no longer have to bend the price, the instrument or the valuation method around a tax on premium. Price the round on the business.
  • One document stays. Keep an independent valuation for the round — FEMA needs it where foreign money comes in, institutional investors ask for it in diligence, and it is your first exhibit if section 68 questions ever arrive.
  • Investor hygiene matters as much as ever. Collect KYC, bank-channel proof of remittance, and evidence of the investor's source of funds before allotment, not after a notice lands. Clean money, documented money.
  • Old rounds stay old. If you issued shares at a premium before financial year 2024-25, keep those valuation reports and, where you claimed it, the Form 2 trail. A question on those years will be answered with the law and papers of those years.
  • Do not let anyone sell you the exemption. Any consultant still charging to "get you angel tax exemption" in 2026 is charging for a door that has been taken off its hinges.

Founders spent twelve years building rounds around this clause — splitting issues, shopping for valuation methods, holding premiums down against their own conviction. That era is over, and good riddance. What replaces it is not a free-for-all; it is the ordinary discipline of a clean cap table: real investors, traceable money, a defensible value, and paperwork that matches the story.

If you are structuring a round now and want the full picture of what DPIIT recognition still does for you after the angel tax — the tax holiday, the funding routes, the procurement and IPR benefits — our page on DPIIT recognition benefits and what the angel tax abolition means for you lays it out, and we are happy to walk your term sheet through it before you sign.